 
Memory for Musical Tones
This set of demonstrations shows a remarkable dissociation between musical tones and spoken words in memory, and indicates that different memory stores are responsible for retaining the various aspects of sound. The CD presents enough test patterns to enable people to conduct entire experiments on this effect. Suppose you play a tone, and this is followed by another tone which is either the same in pitch as the first, or differs by a semitone, most people find it very easy to decide whether the two tones are the same or different. This is true even when the tones are separated by a five second delay, as in the examples played here. Note: In this illustration, and in the two illustrations that follow, the notes that are displayed are not the same as in the sound examples:
Suppose, now, that six extra tones are played during the interval between the test tones. The extra tones often make the judgment very difficult, and this is true even though they can be ignored, as in the examples shown here:
Why should this be? One possibility is that we retain pitches in a specialized memory store, and that memory loss is caused by interference between pitches that are held in this store. If this were so, then presenting other types of material during the time interval between the test tones should not interfere with memory for pitch in the same way. The examples played here consist of patterns in which two test tones are again separated by an interval of five seconds, but now six spoken numbers are presented during this interval, instead of six extra tones. Listen to the first test tone, ignore the spoken numbers if you want to, and then judge whether the second test tone is the same in pitch as the first, or different.
Most people find the memory task much easier when spoken numbers rather than tones are played during the interval between the test tones. This contrasts remarkably with the memory loss that occurs when a sequence of tones is played during the interval between the test tones, even though the extra tones can be ignored. So we conclude that the pitch of a tone is held in a specialized memory store, and that interference takes place between pitches inside this store. Other materials - such as spoken numbers - do not enter the store, so they produce much less interference with memory for pitch.
Deutsch, D. Processing of pitch combinations. In D. Deutsch (Ed.). The psychology of music, 2nd Edition, 1999, 349-412, Academic Press. Deutsch, D. The processing of pitch combinations. In D. Deutsch (Ed.). The Psychology of Music, 1982, 271-316, New York: Academic Press. Deutsch, D. The influence of melodic context on pitch recognition judgement. Perception and Psychophysics, 1982, 31, 407-410, Deutsch, D. Handedness and Memory for Tonal Pitch. In J. Herron (Ed.). Neuropsychology of Lefthandedness, 1980, 263-271, New York: Academic Press. Deutsch, D. Pitch memory: An advantage for the lefthanded. Science, 1978, 199, 559-560, Deutsch, D. Delayed pitch comparisions and the principle of proximity. Perception & Psychophysics, 1978, 23, 227-230, Deutsch, D. Interference in Pitch Memory as a Function of Ear of Input. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978, 30, 282-287, Deutsch, D. Interactive effects in memory for harmonic intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 1978, 24, 7-10, Deutsch, D. Memory and attention to music. In M. Critchley and R. A. Henson (Eds.). Music and the Brain, 1977, 95-130, London: Heinemann Medical Books. Deutsch, D. Facilitation by repetition in recognition memory for tonal pitch. Memory and Cognition, 1975, 3, 263-266, Deutsch, D. & Feroe, J. Disinhibition in pitch memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 1975, 17, 320-324, Deutsch, D. The organization of short term memory for a single acoustic attribute. In D. Deutsch and J. A. Deutsch (Eds.). Short Term Memory, 1975, 107-151, New York: Academic Press. Deutsch, D. Auditory Memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1975, 29, 87-105, Deutsch, D. Generality of interference by tonal stimuli in recognition memory for pitch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 26, 229-234 Deutsch, D. & Roll, P. L. Error patterns in delayed pitch comparisons as a function of relational context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 103, 1027-1034, Deutsch, D. Interference in memory between tones adjacent in the musical scale. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 100, 228-231, Deutsch, D. Octave generalization of specific interference effects in memory for tonal pitch. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 271-275, Deutsch, D. Mapping of Interactions in the Pitch Memory Store. Science, 1972, 175, 1020-1022, Deutsch, D. Effect of Repetition of Standard and Comparison Tones on Recognition Memory for Pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 93, 156-162, Deutsch, D. Music and Memory. Psychology Today, 1972, 8552, 87-89, 119 Deutsch, D. Tones and numbers: Specificity of interference in immediate memory. Science, 1970, 168, 1604-1605, Deutsch, D. Dislocation of Tones in a Musical Sequence: a Memory Illusion. Nature, 1970, 226, 286, |
